HomeBryson
Missing?
chicken
Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: 1983 sometime!
Number of posts: 9785
Registration date: 2009-02-11
Age: 43
Location: Belper
Cornish Ram- Rams Fan Since: 1982
First ever game: Sheff Wed at home, 25/10/89 - Won 2-1.
Number of posts: 1287
Registration date: 2009-03-14
Age: 30
Location: Bristol
Yes, and a striker, creative midfielder...
Ashleys stained pants- Rams Fan Since: 1884
First ever game: West Ham 1975 Charity shield
Number of posts: 2795
Registration date: 2010-10-01
Age: 127
Location: Chaddesden, Alvaston, Chaddesden
Two Centre- halfs
New England Ram- Rams Fan Since: 1968
First ever game: Bury away 1968
Number of posts: 15501
Registration date: 2009-02-18
Age: 52
Location: Boston USA
And a manager plus money.
_________________
Li 150- Admin
- Rams Fan Since: 68
First ever game: Hull City 2-2 28/08/68 Weds
Number of posts: 11425
Registration date: 2009-02-11
Age: 22
Location: Germany
passion, ambition, creativity, positivity
Last edited by Li 150 on Sat 18 Feb 2012, 6:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
_________________
Don't Panic, we've got Theo
Pearson's Right Foot- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: Coventry at PPS, 1998?
Number of posts: 1999
Registration date: 2011-01-11
Location: Cloud 9
Ambition.
_________________
Bottlers 1-2 Battlers
Buxton's Boys 1-0 Hoofball Thugs
Tell me mam me mam
Charingworth Ram- Rams Fan Since: 1974
First ever game: Liverpool home won 2-0 1974
Number of posts: 7181
Registration date: 2009-02-22
Age: 42
Location: Rams World
Does it matter , fans still have their new replica out of date shirts and % interest to look forward to 
AlvoRAM- Rams Fan Since: 95
First ever game: Barnsley 95
Number of posts: 5535
Registration date: 2010-03-24
Age: 28
Location: Alvaston
Damn you lot love to exaggerate don't you... Realistically we are only missing 5 at the back 4 in the middle, and 2 up top... Shouldn't be too hard to find 
chicken- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: 1983 sometime!
Number of posts: 9785
Registration date: 2009-02-11
Age: 43
Location: Belper
Charingworth Ram wrote:Does it matter , fans still have their new replica out of date shirts and % interest to look forward to
ianm- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: First Game
Number of posts: 521
Registration date: 2011-08-24
chicken wrote:Bryson
You think Bryson would have made any difference today. Southampton are a quality outfit Bryson is just a plain workhorse.
chicken- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: 1983 sometime!
Number of posts: 9785
Registration date: 2009-02-11
Age: 43
Location: Belper
ianm wrote:chicken wrote:Bryson
You think Bryson would have made any difference today. Southampton are a quality outfit Bryson is just a plain workhorse.
Yes I do.
ianm- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: First Game
Number of posts: 521
Registration date: 2011-08-24
chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:Bryson
You think Bryson would have made any difference today. Southampton are a quality outfit Bryson is just a plain workhorse.
Yes I do.
With respect I feel you are mistaken. What has Bryson done to be held in such esteem, yes he runs round a lot but most of it is wasted energy. I prefer a midfielder who can see an early pass but Bryson is looking at his boots most of the time. I would clear out Bryson, Green and Bailey this summer, none of them have enough quality on the ball in that key area.
RamNut- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: First Game
Number of posts: 188
Registration date: 2010-09-30
conor doyle might have made a difference
CornwallRam- Rams Fan Since: 1972
Number of posts: 2568
Registration date: 2009-02-20
Age: 44
Location: Cornwall
Ambition - at every level of the club
_________________
Ashleys stained pants- Rams Fan Since: 1884
First ever game: West Ham 1975 Charity shield
Number of posts: 2795
Registration date: 2010-10-01
Age: 127
Location: Chaddesden, Alvaston, Chaddesden
Kinell, you'd need Bodie & Doyle to sort this shit out.RamNut wrote:conor doyle might have made a difference
chicken- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: 1983 sometime!
Number of posts: 9785
Registration date: 2009-02-11
Age: 43
Location: Belper
ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:Bryson
You think Bryson would have made any difference today. Southampton are a quality outfit Bryson is just a plain workhorse.
Yes I do.
With respect I feel you are mistaken. What has Bryson done to be held in such esteem, yes he runs round a lot but most of it is wasted energy. I prefer a midfielder who can see an early pass but Bryson is looking at his boots most of the time. I would clear out Bryson, Green and Bailey this summer, none of them have enough quality on the ball in that key area.
I am not mistaken at all. I feel you are the one who is mistaken when you say Bryson looks at his boots most of the time. Bryson breaks up play, he defends well and he also assists up front. He is an excellent signing.
Boris- Rams Fan Since: 1970
First ever game: Ipswich 2 Rams 6 1976
Number of posts: 1534
Registration date: 2009-02-23
Age: 46
Location: Shropshire
chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:Bryson
You think Bryson would have made any difference today. Southampton are a quality outfit Bryson is just a plain workhorse.
Yes I do.
With respect I feel you are mistaken. What has Bryson done to be held in such esteem, yes he runs round a lot but most of it is wasted energy. I prefer a midfielder who can see an early pass but Bryson is looking at his boots most of the time. I would clear out Bryson, Green and Bailey this summer, none of them have enough quality on the ball in that key area.
I am not mistaken at all. I feel you are the one who is mistaken when you say Bryson looks at his boots most of the time. Bryson breaks up play, he defends well and he also assists up front. He is an excellent signing.
Maybe but he wouldn't have stopped all 4 goals......
Mucker1884- Rams Fan Since: 1975
First ever game: Carlisle - '75 - last match - champs - Ley Stand
Number of posts: 7949
Registration date: 2009-07-22
Age: 49
Location: Derby
Charingworth Ram wrote:Does it matter , fans still have their new replica out of date shirts and % interest to look forward to
Now I'm no psychologist, but I think I know where all this negativity is coming from...........
ianm- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: First Game
Number of posts: 521
Registration date: 2011-08-24
chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:Bryson
You think Bryson would have made any difference today. Southampton are a quality outfit Bryson is just a plain workhorse.
Yes I do.
With respect I feel you are mistaken. What has Bryson done to be held in such esteem, yes he runs round a lot but most of it is wasted energy. I prefer a midfielder who can see an early pass but Bryson is looking at his boots most of the time. I would clear out Bryson, Green and Bailey this summer, none of them have enough quality on the ball in that key area.
I am not mistaken at all. I feel you are the one who is mistaken when you say Bryson looks at his boots most of the time. Bryson breaks up play, he defends well and he also assists up front. He is an excellent signing.
If he is such an excellent signing, why are we second best in midfield in virtually every game. Even Coventry came to our ground and outplayed us for long periods.
chicken- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: 1983 sometime!
Number of posts: 9785
Registration date: 2009-02-11
Age: 43
Location: Belper
ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:Bryson
You think Bryson would have made any difference today. Southampton are a quality outfit Bryson is just a plain workhorse.
Yes I do.
With respect I feel you are mistaken. What has Bryson done to be held in such esteem, yes he runs round a lot but most of it is wasted energy. I prefer a midfielder who can see an early pass but Bryson is looking at his boots most of the time. I would clear out Bryson, Green and Bailey this summer, none of them have enough quality on the ball in that key area.
I am not mistaken at all. I feel you are the one who is mistaken when you say Bryson looks at his boots most of the time. Bryson breaks up play, he defends well and he also assists up front. He is an excellent signing.
If he is such an excellent signing, why are we second best in midfield in virtually every game. Even Coventry came to our ground and outplayed us for long periods.
Perhaps because it's a team game and one man isn't responsible for everybody. Surely he cannot be held responsible for Robinson's lack of first touch, for Tyson's inability to score, for Jamie Ward's loss of form, for Barker's inability to clear his lines properly. Or perhaps for you he can.
ianm- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: First Game
Number of posts: 521
Registration date: 2011-08-24
chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:Bryson
You think Bryson would have made any difference today. Southampton are a quality outfit Bryson is just a plain workhorse.
Yes I do.
With respect I feel you are mistaken. What has Bryson done to be held in such esteem, yes he runs round a lot but most of it is wasted energy. I prefer a midfielder who can see an early pass but Bryson is looking at his boots most of the time. I would clear out Bryson, Green and Bailey this summer, none of them have enough quality on the ball in that key area.
I am not mistaken at all. I feel you are the one who is mistaken when you say Bryson looks at his boots most of the time. Bryson breaks up play, he defends well and he also assists up front. He is an excellent signing.
If he is such an excellent signing, why are we second best in midfield in virtually every game. Even Coventry came to our ground and outplayed us for long periods.
Perhaps because it's a team game and one man isn't responsible for everybody. Surely he cannot be held responsible for Robinson's lack of first touch, for Tyson's inability to score, for Jamie Ward's loss of form, for Barker's inability to clear his lines properly. Or perhaps for you he can.
No I am talking midfield control. I don't think I am commenting too controversially when I say this has been the weakest part of the whole team and Bryson's lack of football intelligence and quality is a major factor in this.
chicken- Rams Fan Since: 0
First ever game: 1983 sometime!
Number of posts: 9785
Registration date: 2009-02-11
Age: 43
Location: Belper
ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:ianm wrote:chicken wrote:Bryson
You think Bryson would have made any difference today. Southampton are a quality outfit Bryson is just a plain workhorse.
Yes I do.
With respect I feel you are mistaken. What has Bryson done to be held in such esteem, yes he runs round a lot but most of it is wasted energy. I prefer a midfielder who can see an early pass but Bryson is looking at his boots most of the time. I would clear out Bryson, Green and Bailey this summer, none of them have enough quality on the ball in that key area.
I am not mistaken at all. I feel you are the one who is mistaken when you say Bryson looks at his boots most of the time. Bryson breaks up play, he defends well and he also assists up front. He is an excellent signing.
If he is such an excellent signing, why are we second best in midfield in virtually every game. Even Coventry came to our ground and outplayed us for long periods.
Perhaps because it's a team game and one man isn't responsible for everybody. Surely he cannot be held responsible for Robinson's lack of first touch, for Tyson's inability to score, for Jamie Ward's loss of form, for Barker's inability to clear his lines properly. Or perhaps for you he can.
No I am talking midfield control. I don't think I am commenting too controversially when I say this has been the weakest part of the whole team and Bryson's lack of football intelligence and quality is a major factor in this.
I don't think you're being controversial at all. I think you are wrong but that's just my opinion, and that's what football is all about. I think Bryson is an excellent signing and we will have to agree to disagree on this one.